Title
Who’s got my back? Comparing consumers’ reactions topeer‐provided and firm‐provided customer support
DOI
10.1002/mar.21283
Abstract
This study demonstrates that when an individual encounters a product‐related problem, fellow consumers (i.e., one’s peers) have a unique advantage in providing social support to the affected consumer. Specifically, we find that social support can be a dominant driver of consumer satisfaction when the risk of customer defection is at its highest (i.e., following an unsuccessful attempt to solve the consumer’s problem). Using real‐world data from an online support community, a pilot study finds that if the problem that a consumer faces goes unsolved, satisfaction is greater when consumers receive peer‐provided versus firm‐provided support. Study 1 replicates this finding in a controlled experiment that realistically simulates an actual customer support incident in real‐time. Study 2 identifies social support as the mechanism that underlies this effect and investigates whether firm employees can take steps to appear more customer‐like and thereby replicate the advantage of peer‐provided support. Finally, Study 3 reveals an alternative strategy (i.e., utilizing multiple employees) that firms can use to enhance social support and provides evidence that peer‐provided support not only enhances satisfaction but also positively influences consumers’ behavioral intentions.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-6-2019
Recommended Citation
Jiang, Lan, Matthew O’Hern, and Sara Hanson. “Who’s Got My Back? Comparing Consumers’ Reactions to Peer-Provided and Firm-Provided Customer Support.” Psychology & Marketing 37, no. 1 (January 2020): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21283.
Included in
Marketing Commons, Public Relations and Advertising Commons, Sales and Merchandising Commons