Abstract
In this article we discuss the role of 105 in bankruptcy law generally rather than in specific bankruptcy cases. We mention a few cases as examples. Mainly, we aim at 105. We work toward an understanding of this section that explains our view of the bottom issue that determines the proper role and use of 105 and also the proper role and use of supplemental law generally.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2000
Recommended Citation
David G. Epstein and Steve H. Nickles, Another Way of Thinking About Section 105(a) and Other Sources of Supplemental Law Under the Bankruptcy Code, 3 Chap. L. Rev. 7 (2000).
Comments
Coauthored with Steve H. Nickles