Abstract
The structure of this Article is as follows. Part I consists of a hypothetical situation which will be referenced throughout the Article to illustrate sex discrimination jurisprudence. Part II describes the Supreme Court's disparate treatment jurisprudence. Part III describes the Court's restructuring of sexual harassment jurisprudence. Finally, Part IV examines the elimination of the distinction between sexual harassment and disparate treatment and its implications, including the new hostile work environment disparate treatment claim.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2000
Recommended Citation
Henry L. Chambers Jr., A Unifying Theory of Sex Discrimination, 34 Ga. L. Rev. 1591 (2000).