Abstract
Lawyers sometimes exaggerate the significance of a single sentence or footnote in a court opinion. At other times a single phrase may turn out to be a time bomb which subsequently explodes with far reaching result:i. Court watchers thus spend considerable time trying to discern what is implied within the literal language of a court's opinion. It is no small irony that one of the latest implications in a Virginia Supreme Court decision relates to the implications contained within an out-of-court statement that cannot be literally defined as hearsay. A modification of the hearsay rule, or at least the hearsay rule applicable to child molestation cases, may be contained within a single paragraph of the Virginia Supreme Court's opinion in Church v. Commonwealth.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1986
Recommended Citation
Ronald J. Bacigal, Implied Hearsay, 12 Va. B. Ass'n J. 16 (1986).