Abstract
The purpose of this article is ( 1) to report on the recent decision in Hoffman v. First Virginia Bank, 1 (2) to identify the several problems this decision has created for the public and for the bar, (3) to propose a statutory solution to these problems, and (4) to suggest an interim approach to these problems that drafters of wills and trusts might take while awaiting the passage of an appropriate statute.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Winter 1982
Recommended Citation
J. Rodney Johnson, Fiduciary's Investment Duty - The Peril of the Prudent Man Rule, Va. B. Ass'n J., Winter 1982, at 12