DOI
10.1177/0956797613516981
Abstract
In the current work, we examined the impact of the American Medical Association’s recent classification of obesity as a disease on weight-management processes. Across three experimental studies, we highlighted the potential hidden costs associated with labeling obesity as a disease, showing that this message, presented in an actual New York Times article, undermined beneficial weight-loss self-regulatory processes. A disease-based, relative to an information-based, weight-management message weakened the importance placed on health-focused dieting and reduced concerns about weight among obese individuals—the very people whom such public-health messages are targeting. Further, the decreased concern about weight predicted higher-calorie food choices. In addition, the disease message, relative to a message that obesity is not a disease, lowered body-image dissatisfaction, but this too predicted higher-calorie food choices. Thus, although defining obesity as a disease may be beneficial for body image, results from the current work emphasize the negative implications of this message for self-regulation.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-24-2014
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2014, SageJournals.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516981
The definitive version is available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797613516981
Recommended Citation
Hoyt, C. L., Burnette, J. L., & Auster-Gussman, L. (2014). “Obesity Is a Disease”: Examining the Self-Regulatory Impact of This Public-Health Message. Psychological Science, 25(4), 997-1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516981

- Citations
- Citation Indexes: 94
- Policy Citations: 2
- Usage
- Downloads: 3
- Captures
- Readers: 303
- Mentions
- News Mentions: 1
Included in
Diseases Commons, Health Policy Commons, Leadership Studies Commons, Medicine and Health Commons, Place and Environment Commons