Abstract
Part I of this article provides a history of the federal appellate system, noting the detrimental impact circuit splits can have on the resolution of a particular legal issue. Part II sets out the history and the current state of asylum and sexual identity claims in the United States. Part III provides an analysis of when the Supreme Court has historically intervened in previous social controversies, such as segregation, interracial marriage, and gay rights in the context of substantive due process. Part IV discusses the importance of timely Supreme Court intervention in asylum sexual identity matters, particularly as issues surrounding gay marriage continue to loom over the horizon.
Recommended Citation
Rory Riley,
From Closet to Court Room: Asylum as a Judicial Step Towards Full Equality between Sexual Orientations,
15
Rich. J. L. & Pub. Int.
403
(2011).
Available at:
https://scholarship.richmond.edu/pilr/vol15/iss2/4