Title
How Shall We Read the History of Ethics? A Response to Melvin Endy
DOI
10.1111/jore.12260
Abstract
This response suggests that in writing the history of ethics, it is important to take seriously what the principals wrote and believed, distinguishing it carefully from our own responses to their writings, or from subsequent uses to which their writings may have been put. For example, when reading Thomas Aquinas and Francisco de Vitoria on just war against non-Christian peoples, forcible conversion and conquest are clearly condemned. Whatever the attitudes of their contemporaries, not to mention later thinkers up to the present, there is no foundation in Aquinas and Vitoria for holy war or “exceptionalism,” American or otherwise.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2019
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2019, Wiley Online Library.
Recommended Citation
Davis, G. Scott. “How Shall We Read the History of Ethics? A Response to Melvin Endy.” Journal of Religious Ethics 47, no. 2 (June 2019): 417–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12260.