DOI
10.1037/xlm0000256
Abstract
Two visual-world eye-tracking experiments investigated the role of prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies (e.g., “The chef reached for some salt uh I mean some ketchup . . .”). Experiment 1 showed that listeners were more likely to fixate a critical distractor item (e.g., pepper) during the processing of repair disfluencies compared with the processing of coordination structures (e.g., “. . . some salt and also some ketchup . . .”). Experiment 2 replicated the findings of Experiment 1 for disfluency versus coordination constructions and also showed that the pattern of fixations to the critical distractor for disfluency constructions was similar to the fixation patterns for sentences employing contrastive focus (e.g., “. . . not some salt but rather some ketchup . . .”). The results suggest that similar mechanisms underlie the processing of repair disfluencies and contrastive focus, with listeners generating sets of entities that stand in semantic contrast to the reparandum in the case of disfluencies or the negated entity in the case of contrastive focus.
Document Type
Post-print Article
Publication Date
9-2016
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2016 American Psychological Association. Article first published online: September 2016.
The definitive version is available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2016-07211-001.html
Please note that downloads of the article are for private/personal use only.
Full citation:
Lowder, Matthew Warren, and Fernanda Ferreira. "Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42, no. 9 (September, 2016): 1400-1416.
Recommended Citation
Lowder, Matthew Warren and Ferreira, Fernanda, "Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm" (2016). Psychology Faculty Publications. 63.
https://scholarship.richmond.edu/psychology-faculty-publications/63