DOI
10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0344
Abstract
A key issue in the decades-long struggle over US health care spending is how to distribute liability for expenses across all market participants, from insurers to providers. The rise and abandonment in the 1990s of capitation payments—lump-sum, per person payments to health care providers to provide all care for a specified individual or group—offers a stark example of how difficult it is for providers to assume meaningful financial responsibility for patient care. This article chronicles the expansion and decline of the capitation model in the 1990s. We offer lessons learned and assess the extent to which these lessons have been applied in the development of contemporary forms of provider cost sharing, particularly accountable care organizations, which in effect constitute a search for the “sweet spot,” or appropriate place on a spectrum, between providers and payers with respect to the degree of risk they absorb.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2012, People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc. This article first appeared in Health Affairs: 31:9 (2012), 1921-1958.
Please note that downloads of the article are for private/personal use only.
Recommended Citation
Mayes, Rick, and Austin B. Frakt. "Beyond Capitation: How New Payment Experiments Seek to Find the 'Sweet Spot' in Amount of Risk Providers and Payers Bear." Health Affairs 31, no. 9 (2012): 1951-958. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0344.