DOI
10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017005
Abstract
In almost every corner of our private and public lives we rely on experts to advise us. This important species of labor is getting increasing attention from economists, who are beginning to learn how to apply their tools and assumptions to the problem of expertise. Under what conditions of supply and demand are experts likely to give us good advice? When is expert failure more likely? Do entrepreneurs challenge existing expertise? Are they experts themselves? And if economists are themselves experts, what happens when we turn the skeptical gaze of economic theory on the economist themselves? This volume publishes papers given at the third biennial Wirth Institute Conference on Austrian Economics. It brings together a heterogeneous collection of thinkers, some "Austrian" and others not, to critically engage the problem of experts. While mostly agreeing that there is a problem of experts, the papers collected here approach the issue from a variety of often-complementary perspectives.
Document Type
Restricted Book Chapter: Campus only access
Publication Date
9-6-2012
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. This book chapter first appeared in Experts and Epistemic Monopolies; Sandra J. Peart & David M. Levy; 19-35.
The definitive version is available at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/s1529-2134(2012)0000017005/full/html
Recommended Citation
Peart, Sandra J., et al. “If Germs Could Sponsor Research: Reflections on Sympathetic Connections among Subjects and Researchers.” Experts and Epistemic Monopolies, vol. 17, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012, pp. 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017005.
