DOI
10.2478/disp-2018-0001
Abstract
Jennifer Saul argues that the evidence from the literature on implicit biases entails a form of skepticism. In this paper, I argue that Saul faces a dilemma: her argument is either self-defeating, or it does not yield a skeptical conclusion. For Saul, both results are unacceptable; thus, her argument fails.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2-2019
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2019, Sciendo.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2018-0001
The definitive version is available at:
https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/disp-2018-0001?tab=abstract
Recommended Citation
Director, S. "A Dilemma for Saulish Skepticism: Either Self-Defeating or Not Even Skepticism" Disputatio, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2018-0001.
