Coalitions and Conflict: A Longitudinal Analysis of Men’s Politics.
DOI
10.1017/ehs.2021.26
Abstract
To negotiate conflict and navigate status hierarchy, individuals in many species form coalitions. We describe inter-personal conflicts and assess theories of coalition formation in a small-scale human society. Based on longitudinal and cross-sectional social network analysis of men in two communities of Tsimane forager–horticulturalists, we find evidence of reciprocity in coalitional support, as well as evidence of transitivity: an ally of my ally is likely to become my ally. We find mixed support for coalition formation between individuals who share a common adversary. Coalition formation was also predicted by food- and labour-sharing and especially by kinship. Physically formidable men and men higher in informal status were more likely to provide coalitional support over time; evidence was mixed that they receive more coalitional support. The highest status men are hubs of a dense coalitional support network that indirectly link all men in the community. These findings suggest that male coalition formation is multiply motivated, and in general reveals the political dynamics that structure men's lives in small, relatively egalitarian communities.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-5-2021
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2021, Cambridge University Press.
Recommended Citation
Redhead, Daniel, and Christopher R. von Rueden. “Coalitions and Conflict: A Longitudinal Analysis of Men’s Politics.” Evolutionary Human Sciences 3 (2021): e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.26.