Uniting Science and Society: The Role of Leadership Studies, Scientific, and Political Leaders in Combating Science Polarization

Authors

Kathryn E. Reda, University of OxfordFollow

Document Type

Commentaries

Abstract

This commentary discusses the recent political polarization of scientific research and how this polarization threatens the neutrality of science in American society. It contends further that leadership studies, along with scientific studies, have become a contentious battleground themselves, particularly on topics like climate change, energy policy, and the COVID-19 pandemic. This is exacerbated by mass media misinformation and declining public trust. Science polarization poses a significant challenge for leadership as it erodes informed decision making, making it crucial for leaders to bridge rather than deepen ideological divides. Leadership studies as a discipline has a responsibility to explore the causes of science polarization and identify actionable steps on how leaders can address this growing issue. The COVID-19 pandemic serves as a valuable case study, highlighting how communication in times of crisis can either mitigate or exacerbate science polarization. By assessing what leaders did well and where they faltered, leadership studies can ensure leaders in the future will be better prepared to navigate science-related challenges. Leaders also have a responsibility to address scientific polarization. Scientific leaders must rethink how they communicate with the public and convey the complexities of intrascientific uncertainty. Meanwhile, political leaders need to foster bipartisan respect for scientific consensus by eliminating the use of divisive political rhetoric and promoting common identity politics when discussing science-related issues. Ultimately, leaders and leadership studies must foster collaboration between policy makers and scientists.

Recommended Citation

Reda, Kathryn E. (2024) "Uniting Science and Society: The Role of Leadership Studies, Scientific, and Political Leaders in Combating Science Polarization," Interdisciplinary Journal of Leadership Studies: Vol. 3, Article 4.
Available at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/ijls/vol3/iss1/4