Document Type
Commentaries
Abstract
Leadership is a relational process characterized by persuasion and context, but leadership studies programs sometimes fail to address what we mean by “good” leadership or the “greatest good.” We rarely ask students to study bad leadership or to examine the constraints—or lack of constraints—on leaders. We do our students a disservice if we fail to ask them first to investigate these thorny questions using historical, literary, and philosophical texts.
Recommended Citation
Peart, Sandra J.
(2024)
"Promise and Progress: Assessing Achievements, New Directions, and Gaps in Leadership Studies,"
Interdisciplinary Journal of Leadership Studies: Vol. 3, Article 2.
Available at:
https://scholarship.richmond.edu/ijls/vol3/iss1/2
COinS