•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This article examines the parallel trajectories of Carl Sagan and Philip Zimbardo as scientists who assumed the role of public intellectuals. Their careers highlighted the tensions and opportunities inherent in bridging scholarly research and public engagement. Sagan, an astronomer, popularized the cosmic perspective to promote planetary stewardship, while Zimbardo, a social psychologist, used compelling methodologies to explore the psychological underpinnings of cruelty and heroism. Both were, in their own ways, heroic in their commitment to making science accessible, employing storytelling and mass media to render complex concepts understandable and relevant, thereby expanding the societal relevance of their disciplines. However, their approaches drew criticism for allegedly romanticizing or dramatizing scientific findings, underscoring the delicate balance between accessibility and rigor. A comparative analysis identifies shared strategies, distinct rhetorical styles, evidence-based storytelling, transparency about methodological limits, and the framing of science as central to humanity’s moral and existential choices.

DOI

10.26736/hs.2025.01.09

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.