Abstract
Prof. Jones responds to a previous writer's arguments that the student-edited law review be replaced by journals edited by law faculty members. He argues that there are not enough willing faculty editors and staff members to sustain the present number and production rate of law journals.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1989
Recommended Citation
John Paul Jones, In Praise of Student-Edited Law Reviews: A Reply to Professor Dekanal, 57 UMKC L. Rev. 241 (1989)
Comments
This is an edited version of the largely extemporaneous remarks delivered at the National Conference of Law Reviews on March 24, 1988, hosted by The University of Richmond School of Law. Prof. Jones is responding to Prof. Afton Dekanal's article, Faculty-Edited Law Reviews: Should the Law Schools Join the Rest of Academe?, 57 UMKC L. Rev. 233 (1989).