Arguments as Abstract Objects
In recent discussions concerning the definition of argument, it has been maintained that the word ‘argument’ exhibits the process-product ambiguity, or (as in Goddu forthcoming) an act/object ambiguity. Drawing on literature on lexical ambiguity we argue that ‘argument’ is not ambiguous. The term ‘argument’ refers to an object, not to a speech act. We also examine some of the important implications of our argument by considering the question: what sort of abstract objects are arguments?
Copyright © 2011, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. This article first appeared in Proceedings of the 9th OSSA Conference, 2011. Argumentation: Cognition & Community (2011).
Please note that downloads of the article are for private/personal use only.
Goddu, G. C, Paul S. Smith, and Andrei Moldovan. "Arguments as abstract objects." Proceedings of the 9th OSSA Conference: Argumentation: Cognition & Community, University of Windsor. May 18, 2011. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA9/keynoteblairprize/4/