Document Type


Publication Date



This paper argues that employing the designations “native speaker” and “native language” unreflectively is to engage in a gesture of othering that operates on an axis of empowerment and disempowerment. Bonfiglio examines the ideological legacy of the apparently innocent kinship metaphors of “mother tongue” and “native speaker” by historicizing their linguistic development. He traces the construction of ethnolinguistic nationalism, a composite of national language, identity, geography, and race, which informed the philology of the early modern era and culminated most divisively in the race-conscious discourses of the 19th century. Bonfiglio makes the case that scholarship should scrutinize the tendency to overextend biological metaphors in the study of language, as even today these encourage, however surreptitiously, genetic and racial impressions of language.

Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2013, Critical Multilingualism Studies. This article first appeared in Critical Multilingualism Studies: 1:2 (2013), 29-58.

Please note that downloads of the article are for private/personal use only.