This Article discusses ethical issues relevant to adoption attorneys, as well as the lessons from behavioral ethics that inform the ethical blind spots common in the practice. The Model Rules for attorneys address a number of areas relevant to the complexitiesof adoption practice. Rules relating to competency and confidentiality, conflicts of interest and dual representation, and the lawyer’s roles as counselor as well as advocate are particularly germane. Although much has been written about the dual representation issue in adoption, other issues of professional responsibility in adoption cases have not been as carefully explored. This Article seeks to remedy that. Since legal ethics can be both descriptive and normative, this Article addresses both what the ethical requirements of professional responsibility are and what they should be in adoption practice. In doing so, this Article considers whether a more child-centered approach to adoption practice comports with the Model Rules.
Malinda L. Seymore,
Ethical Blindspots in Adoption Lawyering,
U. Rich. L. Rev.
Available at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol54/iss2/4
Courts Commons, Family Law Commons, Judges Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons