An Analysis of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims in the Virginia Workplace
This Article first traces the development of the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress as applied to the workplace in the Commonwealth of Virginia in Part I, and offers some observations about the significant hurdles a plaintiff may face in trying to successfully hold an employer accountable for conduct that many in our society would deem unacceptable. After reviewing the evolution of the doctrine since it was first recognized in Virginia nearly fifty years ago in Part II, Part III returns to the incident described above involving Linda Bodewig and her employer, and offers an analysis of how her case would likely be decided in the Virginia courts today—and whether that decision would be the right one.
An Analysis of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims in the Virginia Workplace,
U. Rich. L. Rev.
Available at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol54/iss1/12
Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons