Abstract
This comment examines actual innocence in Virginia: the progress it has made, the problems it still faces, and the possibilities for reform. Part I addresses past reform to the system, spurred by the shocking tales of Thomas Haynesworth and others. Part II identifies three of the most prevalent systemic challenges marring Virginia's justice system: (1) flawed scientific evidence; (2) the premature destruction of evidence; and (3) false confessions and guilty pleas. Part III suggests ways in which Virginia can, and should, address these challenges to ensure that the justice system is actually serving justice.
Recommended Citation
Kaitlyn Potter,
Innocent Suffering: The Unavailability of Post-Conviction Relief in Virginia Courts,
51
U. Rich. L. Rev.
299
(2016).
Available at:
https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol51/iss1/13
Included in
Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Race Commons