Abstract
One may reasonably conclude that a state may escape invalidation of a statute which apparently exceeds permissible Bill of Rights limits if the state shows that the statute does not operatively mean what it appears to say, but rather requires only an allegiance to the Constitution, and secondly, that a state may properly make inquiries to determine the oath affirmant's sincerity and good faith.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Fall 1971
Recommended Citation
W. Wade Berryhill, Constitutional Law - Attorney's Loyalty Fitness, 25 Ark. L. Rev. 327 (1971).