In two samples (N=247, N= 291), we examined the link between beliefs and messages about the changeable (incremental theory) vs. fixed (entity theory) nature of weight, attributions for weight, and body shame. We recruited participants using online sampling, employing a correlational design in Study 1 and an experimental design in Study 2. Across both studies, we found evidence for the stigma-asymmetry effect—incremental, relative to entity beliefs/messages of weight predicted both (a) stronger onset responsibility attributions, indirectly increasing body shame and (b) stronger offset efficacy attributions, indirectly decreasing body shame. Study 2 replicated the stigma-asymmetry effect with anti-fat attitudes. We discuss implications for public health obesity messages with the goal of reducing stigma.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals Inc. Article first published online: 14 August 2017.
The definitive version is available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jasp.12464
Burnette, Jeni L., Crystal L. Hoyt, Carol S. Dweck, and Lisa Auster-Gussman. "Weight Beliefs and Messages: Mindsets Predict Body-Shame and Anti-Fat Attitudes via Attributions." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 47, no.11 (November 2017): 616-624. doi:10.1111/jasp.124664.
Burnette, Jeni L.; Hoyt, Crystal L.; Dweck, Carol S.; and Auster-Gussman, Lisa, "Weight Beliefs and Messages: Mindsets Predict Body-Shame and Anti-Fat Attitudes via Attributions" (2017). Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications. 253.