Abstract
This comment addresses where Virginia's current scheme falls short and why equitable remedies are needed in Virginia minority shareholder oppression cases. Part I looks at how the MBCA attempted to solve the problem of minority shareholder oppression. Part II explores how other jurisdictions have interpreted or added to the MBCA so as to provide additional remedies in minority shareholder oppression cases. Finally, Part III advocates for adoption of a new dissolution statute in Virginia that includes equitable remedies for such cases.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2014
Recommended Citation
Stephanie Martinez, The Power of Paradox: The Need for Alternative Remedies in Virginia Minority Shareholder Oppression Cases, 49 U. Rich. L. Rev. 287 (2014).