Challenging the standard reasoning regarding leaders’ ethical failures, we argue that a potent contributor to these failures is the social role expectations of leaders. We maintain that leaders’ central role expectation of goal achievement contributes to the over-valuing of group goals and greater moral permissibility of the means used to achieve these goals. In studies 1 and 2 we demonstrated that the role of leader, relative to group member, is associated with an increased appraisal of group goals which is predicted by the leaders’ role expectations and not driven by the psychological effects of power. Next, we experimentally demonstrated the importance of both role expectations of leadership and group goal importance in leaders’ justification to engage in morally questionable behavior to achieve group goals. Finally, we supported the social role predictions in a laboratory experiment by assigning people to roles and assessing goal importance and unethical decision-making and behaviors.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Article first published online: 3 AUG 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.001
The definitive version is available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1048984313000696/1-s2.0-S1048984313000696-main.pdf?_tid=b1b161e6-3a7f-11e4-b952-00000aacb35e&acdnat=1410528264_6b0268ef6c5ba5fff46f2f7f63ad4e75
Hoyt, Crystal L., Terry L. Price, and Laura Poatsy. "The Social Role Theory of Unethical Leadership." The Leadership Quarterly 24, no. 5 (October 2013): 712-23. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.001.
Hoyt, Crystal L.; Price, Terry L.; and Poatsy, Laura, "The Social Role Theory of Unethical Leadership" (2013). Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications. 102.